site stats

C# waitforexit doesn't work

WebMar 28, 2024 · Solution 1 Calling pr.Start () in a new Thread isn't going to un-freeze your UI. It's not the act of starting the process that's causing the UI to freeze; it's waiting for the process to finish that's the problem. You can't delete the file until the process has finished, so you have to keep the WaitForExit. WebJun 23, 2024 · Oddly, if you use process.WaitForExit(timeout) overload, it will return true immediately after Kill() from the other thread. However, it's lying. The process is still running! If you try process.WaitForExit() again, as per the MSDN doc, it will still wait for the process to finish despite HasExited saying true.

Process.WaitForExit Method (System.Diagnostics) Microsoft Learn

WebJul 30, 2012 · p.WaitForExit (); And it will sit there and wait for winword.exe to exit. That works fine. However, while it is sitting there waiting for winword.exe to exit, the 30 second timer on a completely separate thread (that sends text to the output window) never runs. WebSep 27, 2010 · Process.WaitForExit () has no failure mode. It's solid, this is rock in the Windows API. So program.exe really did exit. If you still see side-effects of the program after WaitForExit () returned then program.exe is probably a single-instance app. The canonical example of a single-instance app is Microsoft Word. psychopathie und narzissmus https://aaph-locations.com

c# - Making thread wait for exit without resorting to Thread…

WebFeb 17, 2016 · Q&A for work. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. ... In fact, you can use Process.WaitForExit(). Simply get the process to wait for via. Process p = Process.GetProcessById(iYourID); And then call. ... Don't forget Kill() executes asynchronously and doesn't kill any child processes (see … WebExamples. See the code example for the ExitCode property.. Remarks. WaitForExit(Int32) makes the current thread wait until the associated process terminates. It should be called after all other methods are called on the process. To avoid blocking the current thread, use the Exited event.. This method instructs the Process component to wait a finite amount of … WebNov 8, 2024 · Calling Process.WaitForExit () in button clicked event is blocking program. I have written same app using Windows Forms to run process after button was pushed and read its standard output. When I call method "test ()" in button1_Click () my program is blocking. But when I call "test ()" in "Form1" constructor everything work as expected. psychopathiform gedrag

c# - StandardOutput.ReadToEnd() hangs - Stack Overflow

Category:Process: WaitForExit() - social.msdn.microsoft.com

Tags:C# waitforexit doesn't work

C# waitforexit doesn't work

c# - Process WaitForExit not waiting - Stack Overflow

WebFeb 5, 2014 · If the process exits before the timeout elapses, WaitForExit returns. Since you specified a finite timeout, you allow for possibility of the function returning before the process has finished. So, you could write your code like this: if (p.WaitForExit (30000)) return p.ExitCode; else return NotFinishedExitCode; WebSep 26, 2008 · As per msdn, just finish off with the non-timeout version of WaitForExit: When standard output has been redirected to asynchronous event handlers, it is possible that output processing will not have completed when this method returns.

C# waitforexit doesn't work

Did you know?

WebNov 3, 2014 · In particular, in the Process.WaitForExit () method, once it has finished waiting on the process handle itself, it checks to see if a reader for either stdout or stderr has been created; if so, and if the timeout value for the WaitForExit () call is "infinite" (i.e. -1 ), the code actually waits for the end-of-stream on the reader (s).

WebJan 22, 2009 · While there is no async process.WaitForExit(), there is an async process.StandardOutput.ReadToEnd(). In case the process you start doesn't close its standard output (long) before it terminates, you may want to consider this as an alternative (although you still have to process.WaitForExit() afterward in case that it matters). – WebJan 7, 2024 · 3 Answers Sorted by: 6 You need to use CancellationTokenSource. It has a ctor which accepts a TimeSpan var timeoutSignal = new CancellationTokenSource (TimeSpan.FromSeconds (3)); try { await CMD.WaitForExitAsync (timeoutSignal.Token); } catch (OperationCanceledException) { CMD.Kill (); }

WebOct 6, 2015 · The first thing to do when it won't start is find out all the information you can about the problem. The first question is whether Process.Start returned true or false. Secondly, did you get any kind of exception when trying to start the process. WebSep 15, 2024 · The code works properly but after Process.Start when it comes to WaitForExit the programm doesn`t finish. I get the timeout error: System.Threading.ThreadAbortException: Thread was being aborted. at System.Threading.WaitHandle.WaitOneNative (SafeHandle waitableSafeHandle, UInt32 …

WebApr 2, 2013 · This code is wrapped in a while (true) loop and there are no break, throw or return statements within the body of the loop. It will indeed result in an infinite loop. If you want to exit the loop once the WaitForExit has finished then you need to introduce a break statement to do so. clsProcess.WaitForExit (); break; Share Follow

WebApr 22, 2013 · 1 Answer. Sorted by: 0. You should start the actual console command processor "cmd.exe" with C switch instead of invoking a .CMD file. /C switch will keep the cmd.exe process held until your command file finishes execution. WaitForExit () will wait until CMD.exe finishes execution as well. I have used it numerous occasions. psychopathie und soziopathieWebSep 2, 2009 · The WaitForExit () overload is used to make the current thread wait until the associated process terminates. This method instructs the Process component to wait an … hosts laodWebSep 14, 2009 · When you create an instance of the cmd.exe process, it starts the command processor. Redirecting standard input and sending a command to the process will cause … psychopathiesWebThe accepted answer's solution didn't work for me. I had to use tasks in order to avoid the deadlock: //Code to start process here String outputResult = GetStreamOutput (process.StandardOutput); String errorResult = GetStreamOutput (process.StandardError); process.WaitForExit (); With a GetStreamOutput function as follows: psychopathin uhm südkoreaWebSep 10, 2012 · EDIT: Sorry for the diversion, to directly answer your question.Yes, you need to call Process.WaitForExit();.This will ensure that the process has yielded all its output before you call ReadToEnd(). ReadToEnd is synchronous function. Hence if you don't call it in your code, it will block your main thread until it captures only the first output from the … psychopathinWebJan 21, 2009 · While there is no async process.WaitForExit(), there is an async process.StandardOutput.ReadToEnd(). In case the process you start doesn't close its … psychopathinnen buchWebOct 19, 2010 · When I try to run it, it gives me an exception on the "WaitForExit" line indicating "No process is associated with this object." Any help here would be much appreciated! Thanks :) psychopathin als ehefrau