Grepalife vs. court of appeals
WebA Case Digest in Insurance Law GREPALIFE VS CA G.R. NO. 31845. A Case Digest in Insurance Law GREPALIFE VS CA G.R. NO. 31845. kent babs. Refrigeration. ... and JUAN F. NAKPIL, petitioners, vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS, UNITED CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., JUAN J. CARLOS, and the PHILIPPINE BAR ASSOCIATION, … WebNov 22, 2011 · As properly ruled by the lower court as well as the Court of Appeals, the insurance contract was never completed because Grepalife never accepted the insurance offer. The binding deposit …
Grepalife vs. court of appeals
Did you know?
WebOct 13, 1999 · Grepalife assailed the suit and insisted that Medarda is not a proper party in interest. The lower court ruled in favor of Medarda and the court ordered Grepalife to pay the amount of the insurance to DBP. The Court of Appeals affirmed this decision in 1993. Grepalife appealed to the Supreme Court. WebOct 13, 1999 · A contract of group life insurance was executed between petitioner Great Pacific and Development Bank, Grepalife agreed to insure the lives of eligible housing loan mortgagors of DBP. Wilfredo Leuterio, a physician and a housing debtor of DBP, applied for membership in the group life insurance plan. In an
http://lawiq.weebly.com/uploads/3/8/8/7/38876791/digest_-_great_pacific_life_assurance_corp._vs._ca_316_scra_677.pdf WebJun 27, 2024 · The court combines two appeals, each raising the same issue, into a single opinion styled Harvey v. Commonwealth . The issue is whether the Commonwealth must …
WebOct 18, 2015 · Grepalife v. Court of Appeals, 316 SCRA 677 (1999) Facts: · A contract of group life insurance was executed between petitioner Grepalife and DBP. Grepalife agreed to insure… WebCourt of Appeals, 207 SCRA 669; Sun Insurance Office, Ltd. v. Court of Appeals, 211 SCRA 554). Contracts of insurance, like other contracts, are to be construed according to the sense and meaning of the terms which the parties themselves have used. If such terms are clear and unambiguous, they must be taken and understood in their plain ...
WebGrepalife agreed to insure the lives of eligible housing loan mortgagors of DBP. Dr. Wilfredo Leuterio, a physician and a housing debtor of DBP applied for membership in the group life insurance plan. In an application form, Dr. Leuterio answered questions concerning his health condition.
Webof 3 GREAT PACIFIC LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY, petitioner, vs. HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, respondents. G.R. No. L-31845 April 30, 1979 LAPULAPU D. MONDRAGON, petitioner, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS and NGO HING, respondents. G.R. No. L-31878 April 30, 1979 FIRST DIVISION DECISION J. DE CASTRO The Case: f r twiss \\u0026 coWeb> Grepalife was ordered to pay the widow by the Insurance Commissioner holding that there was no intentional concealment on the Part of Canilang and that Grepalife had waived its right to inquire into the health condition of the applicant by the issuance of the policy despite the lack of answers to "some of the pertinent questions" in the … fr twiss \\u0026 coWebJan 17, 2002 · G.R. No. 135219 - January 17, 2002. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, Petitioner , vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS and ERNESTO AUSTRIA and LORETO Q. QUINTANA, Respondents. Before us is a petition for review under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court, seeking a reversal of the Court of Appeals' resolution in CA-G.R. SP No. 48660 … frt wallWebJUAN F. NAKPIL and SONS, and JUAN F. NAKPIL, petitioners, vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS, UNITED CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., JUAN J. CARLOS, and the PHILIPPINE BAR ASSOCIATION, respondents G.R. NO L 47851. Uploaded by kent babs. 0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0 votes) 0 views. 2 pages. Document Information gibson home tri ply copper cookware set 8pcWebThe Court of Appealed found that the use of the word " intentionally " by the Insurance Commissioner in defining and resolving the issue agreed upon by the parties at pre-trial before the Insurance Commissioner was not supported by the evidence; that the issue agreed upon by the parties had been whether the deceased insured, Jaime Canilang, … fr twissWebGREAT PACIFIC LIFE ASSURANCE CORP., petitioner vs. COURT OF APPEALS AND MEDARDA V. LEUTERIO,respondents. G.R. No. 113899 October 13, 1999 SECOND … gibson home zen buffetware 39 pieceWebThe widow, respondent Medarda V. Leuterio, filed against Grepalife. The trial court rendered a decision in favor of respondent widow and against Grepalife. The Court of. Appeals sustained the trial court’s decision. … frt what is it